Time as a holographic stamp
This simple image of Hollywood's golden age deserves consideration. At that moment the Lewys / Hepburn duo was the center of the world, the coolest moment of that day, that hour, that minute, televised to millions of homes. But that instant, like the duration of the kiss, is already part of the past of a whole reality, as was the future of everything that happened before him. So do not be fooled, WE are someone's past and we will always be, indefinitely, as we have been the future until the moment you read this text. With due analogies, if every past is already a future and every future is already a past of an observer (which, by the same token, is in the same past / future situation) means that time does not actually exist, it does not "run" like We are accustomed to think, being past, present and future all blended into the Now. But the lovely Audrey left us in 2013 !!!, - could someone turn up, -: then how time does not exist, if for her it passed the same way for everyone, with old age and the event death? This brings us back to our holographic state of three-dimensional reality, where all the past, present and future are imprinted on a continuum of information already printed and from which there is no possibility of change. Effectively Jerry and Audrey "are there" still and forever and ever. But is this going to be contrary to evolutionary speculation? I believe that no, since even though it is immutable, the future presents itself as the result of the summations of past and present events. The passing of the enchanting actress only corroborates the need for the existence of a state "beyond time" where it no longer But if it is attached to the inexorable continuum of holographic reality. This really can not be broken, cut or erased and often only recorded, as in this kiss clip, mere capture of the light of the moment on the television cameras of the 50's, and even then that day was already a "gift" and now we We already consider it a distant past. And our future? How will we be represented in tens of years? Surely we are already someone's past, but is this someone alive to remember something or to curse us?

Comentários
Postar um comentário